Proof? Took a while to come by, since he didn't take Susan's face and popped it onto another girl (I'm seriously doubting that he's the one that did any of that, doesn't come across as too intellectually gifted tbh). My guess is that who ever did this found a girl to look as close to Susan as they could, and then nip-tucked in a 70% oblique ps layer overlaid onto a pic of Susan. But you are a man of empirical evidence I can see, so why not indulge you? For starters, check out H20G (I see it in your favs). While the big mole on the top-inside of Susan's left breast is there, none of the fakes have the mole on her neck, which one could very logically assume should be there. There is one that the fakes have, but it is located right on their collar bone, while Susan's has hers clearly by the first major wrinkle on her neck a good half to a full inch above the collar bone. More? Check out the spot she has centre left (her left) under her mouth. The fakes don't have it. Neither do they have the one on the left side above the base of her nose. Given the amount of eyeliner in the fake's pix, or better, the lack thereof; I propose that it is logical to assume that they do not have foundation either. This would have made it easier to fix the faces just right to fit to Susan's. Also, check out the pic of Susan in jeans sitting in the sand/surf
[link] . If you brighten the fake picture of her crouching and looking screen left, you will notice that her arm lacks the spots that are on the original's. This is, of course, not full proof, and I wouldn't even set a confidence interval at 0.20 for this, but it is the best that can be done at the moment.